Which of the following statements about the blood alcohol concentration law in Utah is correct?

Which of the following statements about the blood alcohol concentration law in Utah is correct?

• A. It is the first in the nation to set it at .05
• B. It only applies to commercial drivers
• C. It was effective only for a year
• D. It has no penalties for violations

Answer: (A)

The statement that Utah is the first in the nation to set the blood alcohol concentration (BAC) limit at .05 is correct. This law was enacted in 2018 and represents a significant shift in the way states regulate drunk driving. By lowering the legal limit from .08 to .05, Utah aims to reduce alcohol-related accidents and fatalities, promoting safer roadways. This innovative approach sets a precedent for other states, emphasizing a proactive stance towards preventing impaired driving. The other options do not accurately represent the facts related to Utah's BAC law. The law applies to all drivers, not just commercial ones, making option B incorrect. Additionally, the law has been in effect since its implementation in 2018 and is ongoing, which invalidates option C. Lastly, the law has specific penalties for violations, contradicting option D, which suggests that there are no consequences for exceeding the BAC limit.

The statement that Utah is the first in the nation to set the blood alcohol concentration (BAC) limit at .05 is correct. This law was enacted in 2018 and represents a significant shift in the way states regulate drunk driving. By lowering the legal limit from .08 to .05, Utah aims to reduce alcohol-related accidents and fatalities, promoting safer roadways. This innovative approach sets a precedent for other states, emphasizing a proactive stance towards preventing impaired driving.

The other options do not accurately represent the facts related to Utah's BAC law. The law applies to all drivers, not just commercial ones, making option B incorrect. Additionally, the law has been in effect since its implementation in 2018 and is ongoing, which invalidates option C. Lastly, the law has specific penalties for violations, contradicting option D, which suggests that there are no consequences for exceeding the BAC limit.